Publication: Sameness, novelty, and nominal kinds
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Haig, David. 2014. “Sameness, Novelty, and Nominal Kinds.” Biol Philos (July 19). doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9456-9.
Research Data
Abstract
Organisms and their genomes are mosaics of features of different evolutionary age. Older features are maintained by ‘negative’ election and comprise part of the selective environment that has shaped the evolution of newer features by ‘positive’ selection. Body plans and body parts are among the most conservative elements of the environment in which genetic differences are selected. By this process, well-trodden paths of development constrain and direct paths of evolutionary change. Structuralism
and adaptationism are both vindicated. Form plays a selective role in the molding of form.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
adaptation, developmental constraint, evolvability, formal cause, homology, novelty, strategic gene, transposable elements
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service