Publication: Sleeping Beauty in a Grain of Rice
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Haig, David. 2015. “Sleeping Beauty in a Grain of Rice.” Biol Philos (August 30). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9503-1.
Research Data
Abstract
In the Sleeping Beauty problem, Beauty is woken once if a coin lands heads or twice if the coin lands tails but promptly forgets each waking on returning to sleep. Philosophers have divided over whether her waking credence in heads should be a half or a third. Beauty has centered beliefs about her world and about her location in that world. When given new information about her location she should update her worldly beliefs before updating her locative beliefs. When she conditionalizes in this way, her credence in heads is a half before and after being told it is Monday. In applications of Dutch Book arguments to the Sleeping Beauty problem, the probability of a particular outcome has often been confounded with consequences of that outcome. Heads and tails are equally likely but twice as much is at stake if the coin falls tails because Beauty is fated to make the same choice twice. As a consequence, the possibility of tails should be given twice the weight of the possibility of heads when deciding whether to bet on heads even though heads and tails are equally likely.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Sleeping Beauty, Hamilton's rule, credence, relatedness, endosperm, conditionalization, de se beliefs
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service