Publication: Multiple Browsers Structure Tree Recruitment in Logged Temperate Forests
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Faison, Edward K., Stephen DeStefano, David R. Foster, Joshua M. Rapp, and Justin A. Compton. 2016. “Multiple Browsers Structure Tree Recruitment in Logged Temperate Forests.” PLoS ONE 11 (11): e0166783. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166783.
Research Data
Abstract
Historical extirpations have resulted in depauperate large herbivore assemblages in many northern forests. In eastern North America, most forests are inhabited by a single wild ungulate species, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and relationships between deer densities and impacts on forest regeneration are correspondingly well documented. Recent recolonizations by moose (Alces americanus) in northeastern regions complicate established deer density thresholds and predictions of browsing impacts on forest dynamics because size and foraging differences between the two animals suggest a lack of functional redundancy. We asked to what extent low densities of deer + moose would structure forest communities differently from that of low densities of deer in recently logged patch cuts of Massachusetts, USA. In each site, a randomized block with three treatment levels of large herbivores–no-ungulates (full exclosure), deer (partial exclosure), and deer + moose (control) was established. After 6–7 years, deer + moose reduced stem densities and basal area by 2-3-fold, Prunus pensylvanica and Quercus spp. recruitment by 3–6 fold, and species richness by 1.7 species (19%). In contrast, in the partial exclosures, deer had non-significant effects on stem density, basal area, and species composition, but significantly reduced species richness by 2.5 species on average (28%). Deer browsing in the partial exclosure was more selective than deer + moose browsing together, perhaps contributing to the decline in species richness in the former treatment and the lack of additional decline in the latter. Moose used the control plots at roughly the same frequency as deer (as determined by remote camera traps), suggesting that the much larger moose was the dominant browser species in terms of animal biomass in these cuts. A lack of functional redundancy with respect to foraging behavior between sympatric large herbivores may explain combined browsing effects that were both large and complex.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Biology and Life Sciences, Organisms, Animals, Vertebrates, Amniotes, Mammals, Ruminants, Deer, Moose, Ecology, Ecosystems, Forests, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Terrestrial Environments, Plants, Trees, Plant Ecology, Plant-Animal Interactions, Herbivory, Plant Science, Community Ecology, Trophic Interactions, Ecological Metrics, Species Diversity, Temperate Forests, Behavior, Animal Behavior, Foraging, Zoology
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service