Publication:

Modified Criteria for Radiographic Response Assessment in Glioblastoma Clinical Trials

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer US
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Ellingson, Benjamin M., Patrick Y. Wen, and Timothy F. Cloughesy. 2017. “Modified Criteria for Radiographic Response Assessment in Glioblastoma Clinical Trials.” Neurotherapeutics 14 (2): 307-320. doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6.

Abstract

Radiographic endpoints including response and progression are important for the evaluation of new glioblastoma therapies. The current RANO criteria was developed to overcome many of the challenges identified with previous guidelines for response assessment, however, significant challenges and limitations remain. The current recommendations build on the strengths of the current RANO criteria, while addressing many of these limitations. Modifications to the current RANO criteria include suggestions for volumetric response evaluation, use contrast enhanced T1 subtraction maps to increase lesion conspicuity, removal of qualitative non-enhancing tumor assessment requirements, use of the post-radiation time point as the baseline for newly diagnosed glioblastoma response assessment, and “treatment-agnostic” response assessment rubrics for identifying pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and a confirmed durable response in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma trials. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Glioblastoma, GBM, Response Assessment, T1 Subtraction, RANO

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories