Publication:

Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Mostofsky, E., M. Lipsitch, and G. Regev-Yochay. 2011. β€œIs Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Replacing Methicillin-Susceptible S. Aureus?” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 66 (10) (July 7): 2199–2214. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr278.

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the emergence of and treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), prior studies have not rigorously evaluated the impact of methicillin resistance on the overall incidence of S. aureus infections. Yet, there are direct clinical and research implications of determining whether methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infection rates remain stable in the face of increasing MRSA prevalence or whether MSSA will be replaced over time. A synthesis of prior studies indicates that the emergence of healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) has led to an increase in the overall incidence of S. aureus infections, with MRSA principally adding to, rather than replacing, MSSA. However, colonization with CA-MRSA may at least partially replace colonization with MSSA. So far, evidence indicates that MSSA still accounts for many infections. Therefore, eradication of MRSA alone is not sufficient to address the public health burden of S. aureus.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

bacterial resistance, staphylococcal infections, healthcare-associated infections, community-associated infections

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories