Publication:
Cognitive Vulnerability to Major Depression: View from the Intrinsic Network and Cross-network Interactions

Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Wang, Xiang, Dost Öngür, Randy P. Auerbach, and Shuqiao Yao. 2016. “Cognitive Vulnerability to Major Depression: View from the Intrinsic Network and Cross-network Interactions.” Harvard Review of Psychiatry 24 (3): 188-201. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000081.

Research Data

Abstract

Abstract Although it is generally accepted that cognitive factors contribute to the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder (MDD), there are missing links between behavioral and biological models of depression. Nevertheless, research employing neuroimaging technologies has elucidated some of the neurobiological mechanisms related to cognitive-vulnerability factors, especially from a whole-brain, dynamic perspective. In this review, we integrate well-established cognitive-vulnerability factors for MDD and corresponding neural mechanisms in intrinsic networks using a dual-process framework. We propose that the dynamic alteration and imbalance among the intrinsic networks, both in the resting-state and the rest-task transition stages, contribute to the development of cognitive vulnerability and MDD. Specifically, we propose that abnormally increased resting-state default mode network (DMN) activity and connectivity (mainly in anterior DMN regions) contribute to the development of cognitive vulnerability. Furthermore, when subjects confront negative stimuli in the period of rest-to-task transition, the following three kinds of aberrant network interactions have been identified as facilitators of vulnerability and dysphoric mood, each through a different cognitive mechanism: DMN dominance over the central executive network (CEN), an impaired salience network–mediated switching between the DMN and CEN, and ineffective CEN modulation of the DMN. This focus on interrelated networks and brain-activity changes between rest and task states provides a neural-system perspective for future research on cognitive vulnerability and resilience, and may potentially guide the development of new intervention strategies for MDD.

Description

Keywords

cognitive vulnerability, cross-network interaction, functional magnetic resonance imaging, intrinsic network, major depressive disorder

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories