Publication: Neuregulin-1 Administration Protocols Sufficient for Stimulating Cardiac Regeneration in Young Mice Do Not Induce Somatic, Organ, or Neoplastic Growth
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Ganapathy, Balakrishnan, Nikitha Nandhagopal, Brian D. Polizzotti, David Bennett, Alparslan Asan, Yijen Wu, and Bernhard Kühn. 2016. “Neuregulin-1 Administration Protocols Sufficient for Stimulating Cardiac Regeneration in Young Mice Do Not Induce Somatic, Organ, or Neoplastic Growth.” PLoS ONE 11 (5): e0155456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155456.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: We previously developed and validated a strategy for stimulating heart regeneration by administration of recombinant neuregulin (rNRG1), a growth factor, in mice. rNRG1 stimulated proliferation of heart muscle cells, cardiomyocytes, and was most effective when administration began during the neonatal period. Our results suggested the use of rNRG1 to treat pediatric patients with heart failure. However, administration in this age group may stimulate growth outside of the heart. Methods: NRG1 and ErbB receptor expression was determined by RT-PCR. rNRG1 concentrations in serum were quantified by ELISA. Mice that received protocols of recombinant neuregulin1-β1 administration (rNRG1, 100 ng/g body weight, daily subcutaneous injection for the first month of life), previously shown to induce cardiac regeneration, were examined at pre-determined intervals. Somatic growth was quantified by weighing. Organ growth was quantified by MRI and by weighing. Neoplastic growth was examined by MRI, visual inspection, and histopathological analyses. Phospho-ERK1/2 and S6 kinase were analyzed with Western blot and ELISA, respectively. Results: Lung, spleen, liver, kidney, brain, and breast gland exhibited variable expression of the NRG1 receptors ErbB2, ErbB3, ErbB4, and NRG1. Body weight and tibia length were not altered in mice receiving rNRG1. MRI showed that administration of rNRG1 did not alter the volume of the lungs, liver, kidneys, brain, or spinal cord. Administration of rNRG1 did not alter the weight of the lungs, spleen, liver, kidneys, or brain. MRI, visual inspection, and histopathological analyses showed no neoplastic growth. Follow-up for 6 months showed no alteration of somatic or organ growth. rNRG1 treatment increased the levels of phospho-ERK1/2, but not phospho-S6 kinase. Conclusions: Administration protocols of rNRG1 for stimulating cardiac regeneration in mice during the first month of life did not induce unwanted growth effects. Further studies may be required to determine whether this is the case in a corresponding human population.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Medicine and Health Sciences, Diagnostic Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Imaging Techniques, Radiology and Imaging, Biology and Life Sciences, Anatomy, Cardiovascular Anatomy, Heart, Renal System, Kidneys, Physiology, Physiological Parameters, Body Weight, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Statistical Methods, Analysis of Variance, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Statistics (Mathematics), Developmental Biology, Morphogenesis, Regeneration, Heart Regeneration, Organism Development, Respiratory System, Lungs, Pharmacology, Routes of Administration, Subcutaneous Injections
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service