Publication: Why Do White Americans Oppose Race-Targeted Policies? Clarifying the Impact of Symbolic Racism
Date
2009
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Rabinowitz, Joshua L., David O. Sears, Jim Sidanius, and Jon A. Krosnick. 2009. “Why Do White Americans Oppose Race-Targeted Policies? Clarifying the Impact of Symbolic Racism.” Political Psychology 30 (5) (October): 805–828. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00726.x.
Research Data
Abstract
Measures of symbolic racism (SR) have often been used to tap racial prejudice toward Blacks. However, given the wording of questions used for this purpose, some of the apparent effects on attitudes toward policies to help Blacks may instead be due to political conservatism, attitudes toward government, and/or attitudes toward redistributive government policies in general. Using data from national probability sample surveys and an experiment, we explored whether SR has effects even when controlling for these potential confounds and whether its effects are specific to policies involving Blacks. Holding constant conservatism and attitudes toward limited government, SR predicted Whites’ opposition to policies designed to help Blacks and more weakly predicted attitudes toward social programs whose beneficiaries were racially ambiguous. An experimental manipulation of policy beneficiaries revealed that SR predicted policy attitudes when Blacks were the beneficiary but not when women were. These findings are consistent with the claim that SR’s association with racial policy preferences is not due to these confounds.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Symbolic racism, Modern racism, Prejudice, Policy attitudes, Liberal-conservative ideology, Structural equation modeling
Terms of Use
Metadata Only