Publication:

Phylogenetic Hypotheses and the Utility of Multiple Sequence Alignment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of California Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Wheeler, W. C., Giribet, G. 2009. "Phylogenetic hypotheses and the utility of multiple sequence alignment." In Perspectives on Biological Sequence Alignment, edited by Michael Rosenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi:10.1525/california/9780520256972.003.0006

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a potentially useful technique in phylogenetic analysis. This chapter examines the relative effectiveness of MSA and constructs and evaluates phylogenetic hypotheses without the use of this technique, first defining phylogenetic hypothesis, the problem, and the criteria used to assay the relative merits of hypotheses. It also defines the meaning of the utility of a technique, compares the results of alternate techniques, and criticizes the traditional approach to alignment and phylogenetic analysis, with a specific implementation of simultaneous phylogeny and alignment construction. The final section compares the results of a “one-step” optimization heuristic embodied in POY4 with the MSA + Search approach embodied by Clustal, using a large number of small data set simulations run under a variety of conditions and a few larger real data sets.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

multiple sequence alignment, MSA, phylogenetic hypotheses, phylogeny, alignment construction, Clustal

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories