Publication:
Adjusting heterogeneous ascertainment bias for genetic association analysis with extended families

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2015

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Park, S., S. Lee, Y. Lee, C. Herold, B. Hooli, K. Mullin, T. Park, et al. 2015. “Adjusting heterogeneous ascertainment bias for genetic association analysis with extended families.” BMC Medical Genetics 16 (1): 62. doi:10.1186/s12881-015-0198-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12881-015-0198-6.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: In family-based association analysis, each family is typically ascertained from a single proband, which renders the effects of ascertainment bias heterogeneous among family members. This is contrary to case–control studies, and may introduce sample or ascertainment bias. Statistical efficiency is affected by ascertainment bias, and careful adjustment can lead to substantial improvements in statistical power. However, genetic association analysis has often been conducted using family-based designs, without addressing the fact that each proband in a family has had a great influence on the probability for each family member to be affected. Method We propose a powerful and efficient statistic for genetic association analysis that considered the heterogeneity of ascertainment bias among family members, under the assumption that both prevalence and heritability of disease are available. With extensive simulation studies, we showed that the proposed method performed better than the existing methods, particularly for diseases with large heritability. Results: We applied the proposed method to the genome-wide association analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Four significant associations with the proposed method were found. Conclusion: Our significant findings illustrated the practical importance of this new analysis method. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12881-015-0198-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Keywords

Family-based association analysis, Ascertainment, Liability model

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories