Publication: Global surgery in a postconflict setting - 5-year results of implementation in the Russian North Caucasus
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Co-Action Publishing
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Lunze, Fatima I., Karsten Lunze, Zemfira M. Tsorieva, Constantin T. Esenov, Alexandr Reutov, Thomas Eichhorn, and Christian Offergeld. 2015. “Global surgery in a postconflict setting - 5-year results of implementation in the Russian North Caucasus.” Global Health Action 8 (1): 10.3402/gha.v8.29227. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.29227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.29227.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: Collaborations for global surgery face many challenges to achieve fair and safe patient care and to build sustainable capacity. The 2004 terrorist attack on a school in Beslan in North Ossetia in the Russian North Caucasus left many victims with complex otologic barotrauma. In response, we implemented a global surgery partnership between the Vladikavkaz Children's Hospital, international surgical teams, the North Ossetian Health Ministry, and civil society organizations. This study's aim was to describe the implementation and 5-year results of capacity building for complex surgery in a postconflict, mid-income setting. Design: We conducted an observational study at the Children's Hospital in Vladikavkaz in the autonomous Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, part of the Russian Federation. We assessed the outcomes of 15 initial patients who received otologic surgeries for complex barotrauma resulting from the Beslan terrorism attack and for other indications, and report the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications. Results: Patients were treated for trauma related to terrorism (53%) and for indications not related to violence (47%). None of the patients developed peri- or postoperative complications. Three patients (two victims of terrorism) who underwent repair of tympanic perforations presented with re-perforations. Four junior and senior surgeons were trained on-site and in Germany to perform and teach similar procedures autonomously. Conclusions: In mid-income, postconflict settings, complex surgery can be safely implemented and achieve patient outcomes comparable to global standards. Capacity building can build on existing resources, such as operation room management, nursing, and anesthesia services. In postconflict environments, substantial surgical burden is not directly attributable to conflict-related injury and disease, but to health systems weakened by conflicts. Extending training and safe surgical care to include specialized interventions such as microsurgery are integral components to strengthen local capacity and ownership. Our experience identified strategies for fair patient selection and might provide a model for potentially sustainable surgical system building in postconflict environments.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
humanitarian surgery, capacity building, mid-income countries, terrorism, ear–nose–throat surgery, otologic surgery, otologic trauma
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service