Publication:
Risk Prediction in Aortic Valve Replacement: Incremental Value of the Preoperative Echocardiogram

Thumbnail Image

Date

2015

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Tan, Timothy C., Aidan W. Flynn, Annabel Chen‐Tournoux, Lawrence G. Rudski, Praveen Mehrotra, Maria C. Nunes, Luis M. Rincon, David M. Shahian, Michael H. Picard, and Jonathan Afilalo. 2015. “Risk Prediction in Aortic Valve Replacement: Incremental Value of the Preoperative Echocardiogram.” Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 4 (10): e002129. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002129.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Risk prediction is a critical step in patient selection for aortic valve replacement (AVR), yet existing risk scores incorporate very few echocardiographic parameters. We sought to evaluate the incremental predictive value of a complete echocardiogram to identify high‐risk surgical candidates before AVR. Methods and Results: A cohort of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical AVR with or without coronary bypass was assembled at 2 tertiary centers. Preoperative echocardiograms were reviewed by independent observers to quantify chamber size/function and valve function. Patient databases were queried to extract clinical data. The cohort consisted of 432 patients with a mean age of 73.5 years and 38.7% females. Multivariable logistic regression revealed 3 echocardiographic predictors of in‐hospital mortality or major morbidity: E/e’ ratio reflective of elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure; myocardial performance index reflective of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction; and small LV end‐diastolic cavity size. Addition of these echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score led to an integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1% (P<0.0001). After a median follow‐up of 2 years, Cox regression revealed 5 echocardiographic predictors of all‐cause mortality: small LV end‐diastolic cavity size; LV mass index; mitral regurgitation grade; right atrial area index; and mean aortic gradient <40 mm Hg. Conclusions: Echocardiographic measures of LV diastolic dysfunction and RV performance add incremental value to the STS risk score and should be integrated in prediction when evaluating the risk of AVR. In addition, findings of small hypertrophied LV cavities and/or low mean aortic gradients confer a higher risk of 2‐year mortality.

Description

Keywords

aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement, echocardiography, outcomes

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories