Publication:
Clinical Screening of School Children for Polysomnography to Detect Sleep-Disordered Breathing–the Tucson Children’s Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study (TuCASA)

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2005-07-15

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Goodwin, James L., Kris L. Kaemingk, Shelagh A. Mulvaney, Wayne J. Morgan, Stuart Quan. "Clinical Screening of School Children for Polysomnography to Detect Sleep-Disordered Breathing–the Tucson Children’s Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study (TuCASA)." Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 1, no. 3 (2005): 247-254. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.26338

Research Data

Abstract

Study Objectives This report describes the associations, specificities, sensitivities, and positive likelihood ratios of clinical symptoms to a finding of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on polysomnography in children. Methods Four hundred eighty unattended home polysomnograms were completed in a community-based cohort of children 6 to 11 years of age (50% boys, 42.3% Hispanic, and 52.9% between the ages of 6 and 8 years). SDB was present if the child had a respiratory disturbance index of ≥ 1 event per hour. Measurements and Results Boys were twice as likely as girls to have SDB (p<.01); however, witnessed apnea, ethnicity, age, obesity, and air-way size (based on clinical evaluation) were not significantly different between those with SDB and without SDB. The sensitivity of any individual or combined clinical symptoms was poor, with male sex (60%) and snoring (29.5%) having the greatest proportion of SDB children. However, high specificities for snoring (89.5%), excessive daytime sleepiness (86.3%), and learning problems (95.9%) were noted. Combinations of symptoms such as snoring+male sex (95.1%), snoring+excessive daytime sleepiness (97.0%), and snoring+learning problems (98.9%) had specificities approaching 1. Positive likelihood ratios for snoring (2.8), learning (2.8), and symptoms combined with snoring such as snoring+male sex(3.9), snoring+learning problems (4.0), and snoring+excessive daytime sleepiness (2.9) were observed. Conclusions Snoring, excessive daytime sleepiness, and learning problems are each highly specific, but not sensitive, for SDB in 6- to 11-year old children. However, specificities and positive likelihood ratios for the combination of some of these symptoms is sufficiently high to suggest that some children may not require a polysomnogram for the diagnosis of SDB.

Description

Keywords

Clinical Neurology, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories