Publication:

Asymptotic Theory of Rerandomization in Treatment-Control Experiments

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Li, Xinran, Peng Ding, & Donald B. Rubin. 2016. Asymptotic Theory of Rerandomization in Treatment-Control Experiments. Annals of Statistics 115, no. 37: 9157–9162.

Abstract

Although complete randomization ensures covariate balance on average, the chance for ob- serving significant differences between treatment and control covariate distributions increases with many covariates. Rerandomization discards randomizations that do not satisfy a prede- termined covariate balance criterion, generally resulting in better covariate balance and more precise estimates of causal effects. Previous theory has derived finite sample theory for reran- domization under the assumptions of equal treatment group sizes, Gaussian covariate and out- come distributions, or additive causal effects, but not for the general sampling distribution of the difference-in-means estimator for the average causal effect. To supplement existing results, we develop asymptotic theory for rerandomization without these assumptions, which reveals a non-Gaussian asymptotic distribution for this estimator, specifically a linear combination of a Gaussian random variable and a truncated Gaussian random variable. This distribution follows because rerandomization affects only the projection of potential outcomes onto the covariate space but does not affect the corresponding orthogonal residuals. We also demonstrate that, compared to complete randomization, rerandomization reduces the asymptotic sampling vari- ances and quantile ranges of the difference-in-means estimator. Moreover, our work allows the construction of accurate large-sample confidence intervals for the average causal effect, thereby revealing further advantages of rerandomization over complete randomization.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories