Publication:
The MELD-Plus: A generalizable prediction risk score in cirrhosis

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Kartoun, Uri, Kathleen E. Corey, Tracey G. Simon, Hui Zheng, Rahul Aggarwal, Kenney Ng, and Stanley Y. Shaw. 2017. “The MELD-Plus: A generalizable prediction risk score in cirrhosis.” PLoS ONE 12 (10): e0186301. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186301.

Research Data

Abstract

Background and aims Accurate assessment of the risk of mortality following a cirrhosis-related admission can enable health-care providers to identify high-risk patients and modify treatment plans to decrease the risk of mortality. Methods: We developed a post-discharge mortality prediction model for patients with a cirrhosis-related admission using a population of 314,292 patients who received care either at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) or Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) between 1992 and 2010. We extracted 68 variables from the electronic medical records (EMRs), including demographics, laboratory values, diagnosis codes, and medications. We then used a regularized logistic regression to select the most informative variables and created a risk score that comprises the selected variables. To evaluate the potential for generalizability of our score, we applied it on all cirrhosis-related admissions between 2010 and 2015 at an independent EMR data source of more than 18 million patients, pooled from different health-care systems with EMRs. We calculated the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) to assess prediction performance. Results: We identified 4,781 cirrhosis-related admissions at MGH/BWH hospitals, of which 778 resulted in death within 90 days of discharge. Nine variables were the most effective predictors for 90-day mortality, and these included all MELD-Na’s components, as well as albumin, total cholesterol, white blood cell count, age, and length of stay. Applying our nine-variable risk score (denoted as “MELD-Plus”) resulted in an improvement over MELD and MELD-Na scores in several prediction models. On the MGH/BWH 90-day model, MELD-Plus improved the performance of MELD-Na by 11.4% (0.78 [95% CI, 0.75–0.81] versus 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66–0.73]). In the MGH/BWH approximate 1-year model, MELD-Plus improved the performance of MELD-Na by 8.3% (0.78 [95% CI, 0.76–0.79] versus 0.72 [95% CI, 0.71–0.73]). Performance improvement was similar when the novel MELD-Plus risk score was applied to an independent database; when considering 24,042 cirrhosis-related admissions, MELD-Plus improved the performance of MELD-Na by 16.9% (0.69 [95% CI, 0.69–0.70] versus 0.59 [95% CI, 0.58–0.60]). Conclusions: We developed a new risk score, MELD-Plus that accurately stratifies the short-term mortality of patients with established cirrhosis, following a hospital admission. Our findings demonstrate that using a small set of easily accessible structured variables can help identify novel predictors of outcomes in cirrhosis patients and improve the performance of widely used traditional risk scores.

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Population Biology, Population Metrics, Death Rates, Medicine and Health Sciences, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Diseases, Cirrhosis, Database and Informatics Methods, Health Informatics, Electronic Medical Records, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Statistical Methods, Forecasting, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Statistics (Mathematics), Biochemistry, Lipids, Cholesterol, Proteins, Albumins, Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures, Digestive System Procedures, Liver Transplantation, Transplantation, Organ Transplantation, Oncology, Cancers and Neoplasms, Carcinomas, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Gastrointestinal Tumors

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories