Publication:
Modeling the adenosine system as a modulator of cognitive performance and sleep patterns during sleep restriction and recovery

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Phillips, Andrew J. K., Elizabeth B. Klerman, and James P. Butler. 2017. “Modeling the adenosine system as a modulator of cognitive performance and sleep patterns during sleep restriction and recovery.” PLoS Computational Biology 13 (10): e1005759. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005759.

Research Data

Abstract

Sleep loss causes profound cognitive impairments and increases the concentrations of adenosine and adenosine A1 receptors in specific regions of the brain. Time courses for performance impairment and recovery differ between acute and chronic sleep loss, but the physiological basis for these time courses is unknown. Adenosine has been implicated in pathways that generate sleepiness and cognitive impairments, but existing mathematical models of sleep and cognitive performance do not explicitly include adenosine. Here, we developed a novel receptor-ligand model of the adenosine system to test the hypothesis that changes in both adenosine and A1 receptor concentrations can capture changes in cognitive performance during acute sleep deprivation (one prolonged wake episode), chronic sleep restriction (multiple nights with insufficient sleep), and subsequent recovery. Parameter values were estimated using biochemical data and reaction time performance on the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT). The model closely fit group-average PVT data during acute sleep deprivation, chronic sleep restriction, and recovery. We tested the model’s ability to reproduce timing and duration of sleep in a separate experiment where individuals were permitted to sleep for up to 14 hours per day for 28 days. The model accurately reproduced these data, and also correctly predicted the possible emergence of a split sleep pattern (two distinct sleep episodes) under these experimental conditions. Our findings provide a physiologically plausible explanation for observed changes in cognitive performance and sleep during sleep loss and recovery, as well as a new approach for predicting sleep and cognitive performance under planned schedules.

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Physiology, Physiological Processes, Sleep, Medicine and Health Sciences, Biochemistry, Glycobiology, Glycosylamines, Nucleosides, Adenosine, Neurology, Sleep Deprivation, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Neurology, Cognitive Impairment, Homeostasis, Homeostatic Mechanisms, Cell Biology, Cell Physiology, Receptor Physiology, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Mathematical Models

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories