Standardization of health outcomes assessment for depression and anxiety: recommendations from the ICHOM Depression and Anxiety Working Group
Open/View files
Date
2017
Author(s)
Obbarius, Alexander
van Maasakkers, Lisa
Baer, Lee
Clark, David M.
Crocker, Anne G.
de Beurs, Edwin
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
Furukawa, Toshi A.
Hedman-Lagerlöf, Erik
Kangas, Maria
Langford, Lucie
Lesage, Alain
Mwesigire, Doris M.
Nolte, Sandra
Pilkonis, Paul A.
Pincus, Harold A.
Reis, Roberta A.
Rojas, Graciela
Sherbourne, Cathy
Smithson, Dave
Stowell, Caleb
Woolaway-Bickel, Kelly
Rose, Matthias
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Obbarius, A., L. van Maasakkers, L. Baer, D. M. Clark, A. G. Crocker, E. de Beurs, P. M. G. Emmelkamp, et al. 2017. “Standardization of health outcomes assessment for depression and anxiety: recommendations from the ICHOM Depression and Anxiety Working Group.” Quality of Life Research 26 (12): 3211-3225. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1659-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1659-5.
Abstract
Purpose National initiatives, such as the UK Improving Access to Psychological Therapies program (IAPT), demonstrate the feasibility of conducting empirical mental health assessments on a large scale, and similar initiatives exist in other countries. However, there is a lack of international consensus on which outcome domains are most salient to monitor treatment progress and how they should be measured. The aim of this project was to propose (1) an essential set of outcome domains relevant across countries and cultures, (2) a set of easily accessible patient-reported instruments, and (3) a psychometric approach to make scores from different instruments comparable. Methods: Twenty-four experts, including ten health outcomes researchers, ten clinical experts from all continents, two patient advocates, and two ICHOM coordinators worked for seven months in a consensus building exercise to develop recommendations based on existing evidence using a structured consensus-driven modified Delphi technique. Results: The group proposes to combine an assessment of potential outcome predictors at baseline (47 items: demographics, functional, clinical status, etc.), with repeated assessments of disease-specific symptoms during the treatment process (19 items: symptoms, side effects, etc.), and a comprehensive annual assessment of broader treatment outcomes (45 items: remission, absenteeism, etc.). Further, it is suggested reporting disease-specific symptoms for depression and anxiety on a standardized metric to increase comparability with other legacy instruments. All recommended instruments are provided online (www.ichom.org). Conclusion: An international standard of health outcomes assessment has the potential to improve clinical decision making, enhance health care for the benefit of patients, and facilitate scientific knowledge. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1659-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Other Available Sources
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
Collection
Mapped collections