Publication:

Injection Drug Use and Infectious Disease Practice: A National Provider Survey

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Rapoport, Alison B, Susan E Beekmann, Philip M Polgreen, and Christopher F Rowley. 2017. “Injection Drug Use and Infectious Disease Practice: A National Provider Survey.” Open Forum Infectious Diseases 4 (Suppl 1): S340. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.810.

Abstract

Abstract Background: The opioid epidemic has swept across the U.S. at a staggering rate, with an estimated half million to one million persons injecting drugs annually. Rates of hospitalization for injection drug use (IDU)-related infection have risen precipitously, comprising an escalating proportion of infectious diseases provider volume in highly impacted regions. Methods: In March 2017, the Emerging Infections Network surveyed their national network of infectious diseases (ID) physicians to evaluate perspectives relating to the care of persons who inject drugs (PWID), including the frequency of, and management strategies for, IDU-related infection, the availability of addiction services, and the evolving role of ID physicians in the management of addiction. Results: Over half (53%; N = 672) of 1,276 members with an adult ID practice participated; 78% (n = 526) reported treating PWID. Of 526 respondents, 464 (88%) reported seeing ≥1 patient per month with an IDU-related infection; 228 (43%) reported ≥6 per month. In the past year, 79% of respondents reported the majority of IDU-related infections seen required ≥2 weeks of parenteral therapy and reported frequently encountering skin and soft-tissue infections (61%), bacteremia/fungemia (53%), and endocarditis (50%). Strategies most commonly employed for management of prolonged parenteral antibiotic therapy included: completion of entire course on inpatient unit (by 41%) and transfer to supervised facility for completion (35%). Only 35% of respondents agree/strongly agree their health system offers comprehensive treatment of substance use disorders (N = 181). Though nearly half of respondents felt that ID providers should actively manage substance use disorders (46%; N = 241), only 3% reported being waivered to prescribe buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. Conclusion: The majority of infectious diseases physicians frequently care for PWID with serious infections. There is significant diversity amongst providers with regards to the availability of comprehensive addiction services as well as perceptions regarding the role providers should play in the management of addiction. Guidelines for the management of serious infections and concurrent addiction in the midst of the escalating national opioid crisis should be considered. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Poster Abstract

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories