Publication:

The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Cafiero-Fonseca, Elizabeth T., Andrew Stawasz, Sydney T. Johnson, Reiko Sato, and David E. Bloom. 2017. “The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review.” PLoS ONE 12 (10): e0186903. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186903.

Abstract

Background: Pneumococcal disease causes substantial morbidity and mortality, including among adults. Adult pneumococcal vaccines help to prevent these burdens, but they are underused. Accounting for the full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination may promote more rational resource allocation decisions with respect to adult pneumococcal vaccines. Objectives: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to assess the extent to which the literature has empirically captured (e.g., through measurement or modeling) the full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase to identify studies published between January 1, 2010 and April 10, 2016 that examine adult pneumococcal vaccination. We included articles if they captured any health or economic benefit of an adult pneumococcal vaccine administered to adults age ≥ 50 or ≥ 18 in risk groups. Finally, we summarized the literature by categorizing the types of benefits captured, the perspective taken, and the strength of the evidence presented. Our protocol is number 42016038335 in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. Results: We identified 5,857 papers and included 150 studies for analysis. While most capture health gains and healthcare cost savings, far fewer studies consider additional benefit categories, such as productivity gains. However, the studies with a broader approach still exhibit significant limitations; for example, many present only abstracts, while others offer no new measurements. Studies that examine the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine focus more on broad economic benefits, but still have limitations. Conclusions: This review highlights the need for more robust empirical accounting of the full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination. Literature outside this realm indicates that these broad benefits may be substantial. Failing to investigate the full benefits may lead society to undervalue vaccines' contributions and therefore underinvest in their development and adoption.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Immunology, Vaccination and Immunization, Medicine and Health Sciences, Public and Occupational Health, Preventive Medicine, People and Places, Population Groupings, Age Groups, Adults, Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Control, Vaccines, Social Sciences, Economics, Health Economics, Health Care, Systematic Reviews, Database and Informatics Methods, Database Searching, Elderly, Socioeconomic Aspects of Health

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories