Publication:

Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

van Ditzhuijzen, N. S., M. Kurata, M. van den Heuvel, O. Sorop, R. W. B. van Duin, I. Krabbendam-Peters, J. Ligthart, et al. 2017. “Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine.” PLoS ONE 12 (9): e0183419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183419.

Abstract

Background: DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome after stent-implantation, but little is known if and how DM affects the vascular response to BVS. Aim The aim of our study was to examine coronary responses to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in swine with and without diabetes mellitus fed a ‘fast-food’ diet (FF-DM and FF-NDM, respectively) by sequential optical coherence tomography (OCT)-imaging and histology. Methods: Fifteen male swine were evaluated. Eight received streptozotocin-injection to induce DM. After 9 months (M), 32 single BVS were implanted in epicardial arteries with a stent to artery (S/A)-ratio of 1.1:1 under quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT guidance. Lumen, scaffold, neointimal coverage and composition were assessed by QCA, OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and/or post-procedure, at 3M and 6M. Additionally, polarization-sensitive (PS)-OCT was performed in 7 swine at 6M. After sacrifice at 3M and 6M, histology and polymer degradation analysis were performed. Results: Late lumen loss was high (~60%) within the first 3M after BVS-implantation (P<0.01 FF-DM vs. FF-NDM) and stabilized between 3M and 6M (<5% change in FF-DM, ~10% in FF-NDM; P>0.20). Neointimal coverage was highly heterogeneous in all swine (DM vs. NDM P>0.05), with focal lipid accumulation, irregular collagen distribution and neointimal calcification. Likewise, polymer mass loss was low (~2% at 3M, ~5% at 6M;P>0.20) and not associated with DM or inflammation. Conclusion: Scaffold coverage showed signs of neo-atherosclerosis in all FF-DM and FF-NDM swine, scaffold polymer was preserved and the vascular response to BVS was not influenced by diabetes.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Organisms, Animals, Vertebrates, Amniotes, Mammals, Swine, Biochemistry, Lipids, Medicine and Health Sciences, Diagnostic Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Tomography, Imaging Techniques, Radiology and Imaging, Endocrinology, Endocrine Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Metabolic Disorders, Anatomy, Histology, Spectrum Analysis Techniques, Infrared Spectroscopy, near-Infrared Spectroscopy, Physiology, Physiological Processes, Calcification, Immunology, Immune Response, Inflammation, Signs and Symptoms, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories