Publication:

The Great Debate at “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, December 2nd, 2017

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Ascierto, Paolo A., Corrado Caracò, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Omid Hamid, Merrick Ross, Ryan J. Sullivan, and Igor Puzanov. 2018. “The Great Debate at “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, December 2nd, 2017.” Journal of Translational Medicine 16 (1): 101. doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1477-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1477-8.

Abstract

As part of the 2017 Melanoma Bridge congress (November 30–December 2, 2017, Napoli, Italy), the great debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three contemporary controversial clinical issues in the care of the melanoma patient. These were: (1) whether complete lymph node dissection should be routinely offered to all melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node-positive disease; (2) whether first-line treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma should consist of BRAF-targeted therapy or immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors; and (3) whether combined or sequential administration of treatments should be the preferred option in the management of patients with advanced melanoma. Discussion of these three important issues and audience responses are reported here.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Melanoma, Lymphadenectomy, Targeted therapy, Immunotherapy, Combination

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories