Publication: Higher retention and viral suppression with adolescent-focused HIV clinic in South Africa
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Zanoni, Brian C., Thobekile Sibaya, Chelline Cairns, Sara Lammert, and Jessica E. Haberer. 2017. “Higher retention and viral suppression with adolescent-focused HIV clinic in South Africa.” PLoS ONE 12 (12): e0190260. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190260.
Research Data
Abstract
Objective: To determine retention in care and virologic suppression among HIV-infected adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to those attending the standard pediatric clinic at the same site. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: Government supported, hospital-based antiretroviral clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Participants: Two hundred forty-one perinatally HIV-infected adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 24 years attending an adolescent-friendly clinic or the standard pediatric clinic from April 2007 to November 2015. Intervention Attendance in an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to a standard pediatric clinic. Outcomes measures Retention in care defined as one clinic visit or pharmacy refill in the prior 6 months; HIV-1 viral suppression defined as < 400 copies/ml. Results: Overall, among 241 adolescents and young adults, retention was 89% (214/241) and viral suppression was 81% (196/241). Retention was higher among those attending adolescent clinic (95%) versus standard pediatric clinic (85%; OR 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–11.1; p = 0.018). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age at ART initiation, gender, pre-ART CD4 count, months on ART, and tuberculosis history indicated higher odds of retention in adolescents and young adults attending adolescent compared to standard clinic (AOR = 8.5; 95% CI 2.3–32.4; p = 0.002). Viral suppression was higher among adolescents and young adults attending adolescent (91%) versus standard pediatric clinic (80%; OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1–5.8; p = 0.028). A similar multivariable logistic regression model indicated higher odds of viral suppression in adolescents and young adults attending adolescent versus standard pediatric clinic (AOR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.5–9.7; p = 0.005). Conclusion: Adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic had higher retention in care and viral suppression compared to adolescents attending the standard pediatric clinic. Further studies are needed to prospectively assess the impact of adolescent-friendly services on these outcomes.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
People and Places, Population Groupings, Age Groups, Young Adults, Children, Adolescents, Families, Medicine and Health Sciences, Pediatrics, Biology and Life Sciences, Immunology, Vaccination and Immunization, Antiviral Therapy, Antiretroviral Therapy, Public and Occupational Health, Preventive Medicine, Microbiology, Medical Microbiology, Microbial Pathogens, Viral Pathogens, Immunodeficiency Viruses, HIV, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pathogens, Organisms, Viruses, Biology and life sciences, RNA viruses, Retroviruses, Lentivirus, People and places, Geographical locations, Africa, South Africa, Virology, Viral Transmission and Infection, Viral Load, Social Sciences, Sociology, Education, Schools
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service