Publication:

Evaluating Foundational Data Quality in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet®)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2018

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ubiquity Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Qualls, Laura Goettinger, Thomas A. Phillips, Bradley G. Hammill, James Topping, Darcy M. Louzao, Jeffrey S. Brown, Lesley H. Curtis, and Keith Marsolo. 2018. “Evaluating Foundational Data Quality in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet®).” eGEMs 6 (1): 3. doi:10.5334/egems.199. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.199.

Abstract

Introduction: Distributed research networks (DRNs) are critical components of the strategic roadmaps for the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration as they work to move toward large-scale systems of evidence generation. The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet®) is one of the first DRNs to incorporate electronic health record data from multiple domains on a national scale. Before conducting analyses in a DRN, it is important to assess the quality and characteristics of the data. Methods: PCORnet’s Coordinating Center is responsible for evaluating foundational data quality, or assessing fitness-for-use across a broad research portfolio, through a process called data curation. Data curation involves a set of analytic and querying activities to assess data quality coupled with maintenance of detailed documentation and ongoing communication with network partners. The first cycle of PCORnet data curation focused on six domains in the PCORnet common data model: demographics, diagnoses, encounters, enrollment, procedures, and vitals. Results: The data curation process led to improvements in foundational data quality. Notable improvements included the elimination of data model conformance errors; a decrease in implausible height, weight, and blood pressure values; an increase in the volume of diagnoses and procedures; and more complete data for key analytic variables. Based on the findings of the first cycle, we made modifications to the curation process to increase efficiencies and further reduce variation among data partners. Discussion: The iterative nature of the data curation process allows PCORnet to gradually increase the foundational level of data quality and reduce variability across the network. These activities help increase the transparency and reproducibility of analyses within PCORnet and can serve as a model for other DRNs.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

electronic health records, quality improvement, patient-centered care, distributed research networks, data quality

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories