Publication: The Use of Pharmacological Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalised Patients With Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014-05
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Pleet, J. L., Byron P. Vaughn, J. A. Morris, Alan C. Moss, Adam Cheifetz. "The Use of Pharmacological Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalised Patients With Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis." Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 39, no. 9 (2014): 940-948. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12691
Research Data
Abstract
Background
Hospitalised patients with inflammatory bowel disease are 1.5- to 3.5-fold more likely to develop venous thromboembolism compared to controls. Clinical guidelines recommend pharmacological prophylaxis.
Aim
To determine the rate of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis prescription and administration in a cohort of hospitalised patients with severe active ulcerative colitis and to assess predictors of failure to order pharmacological prophylaxis at 24 h.
Methods
This is a retrospective review of hospitalised patients with severe active ulcerative colitis, identified by ICD-9-CM discharge code 556.x, admitted to a single tertiary care hospital from 1 January 2005 to 31 August 2012. Adequate thromboembolism prophylaxis was defined as an order for low-dose unfractionated heparin two to three times daily, low-molecular weight heparin 40 mg daily or fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily ordered and administered for >80% of the admission. Patient related factors associated with failure to order prophylaxis at 24 h were accessed as secondary outcomes.
Results
Three hundred and thirty-six patients were hospitalised with severe active ulcerative colitis. Hospitalists had prescribed appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis by 48 h in only 37% of cases. Of these, nurses administered all prescribed doses in 18% of cases. Only 7% of patients (22/304, 95% CI: 5–11%) received adequate pharmacological prophylaxis for >80% of their hospitalisation. Hematochezia (P = 0.002), elevated platelets (P = 0.008), male gender coupled with younger age (P = 0.005) and admission on a biologic (P = 0.03) were associated with failure to order prophylaxis.
Conclusion
Hospitalised patients admitted with severe active ulcerative colitis are not receiving appropriate pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Pharmacology (medical), Gastroenterology, Hepatology
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service