Publication: Therapeutic Evolution or Revolution? Metaphors and Their Consequences
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Jones, David S. 2016. Therapeutic Evolution or Revolution? Metaphors and Their Consequences. In Therapeutic Revolutions: Pharmaceuticals and Social Change in the Twentieth Century, eds Jeremy A. Greene, Flurin Condrau, and Elizabeth Siegel Watkins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Research Data
Abstract
Evolution and revolution are both models of change over time. It is easy to see the appeal of a claim of revolution for scientists and for their historians: it pronounces a radical break from the past, confident and triumphant. Progress is implied by the decisiveness of the rupture. Such rhetoric is good for marketing, especially when contrasted against the cautious gradualism of evolution. But evolution has its own appeals, especially its reassuring connotations of progressive improvement. It is not enough simply to debate what counts, or not, as revolution or evolution. Instead, much can be gained through serious engagement with the theory and language of revolution and evolution in pursuit of the best possible accounts of scientific change.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
revolution, evolution, metaphors, history of therapeutics, history of biology, twentieth century history
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service