Publication: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a different disease entity in terms of management
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ESMO Open
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Leow, Jeffrey J, Kian Tai Chong, Steven L Chang, and Joaquim Bellmunt. 2016. “Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a different disease entity in terms of management.” ESMO Open 1 (6): e000126. doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000126.
Research Data
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) consist of 5%–10% of all urothelial carcinomas, the rest being urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (UCB). There is increasing evidence to show that UTUC is a distinct disease entity from UCB based on phenotypical and genotypical (genetic and epigenetic) differences. This may account for why the natural history of UTUC is different from that of UCB, with >60% of UTUCs and only 15%–25% of UCB presenting with invasion at diagnosis. Management of UTUC is thus different from UCB in a variety of ways, ranging from surgical management, postoperative instillation therapy, postoperative surveillance and medical management (neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy). This review paper aims to highlight these differences with an emphasis on the distinct management of UTUC, along with the latest updates.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
upper tract urothelial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of bladder, chemotherapy, radical nephroureterectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service