Publication:

When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2015

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Campos, Nicole G., Vivien Tsu, Jose Jeronimo, Mercy Mvundura, Kyueun Lee, and Jane J. Kim. 2015. “When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis.” Papillomavirus Research 1 (1): 38-58. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003.

Abstract

World Health Organization guidelines recommend that cervical cancer screening programs should prioritize screening coverage in women aged 30 to 49 years. Decisions about target ages and screening frequency depend upon local burden of disease, costs, and capacity. We used cost and test performance data from the START-UP demonstration projects in India, Nicaragua, and Uganda to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening at various start ages, intervals, and frequencies. We calibrated a mathematical simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis to each country and compared screening with careHPV (cervical and vaginal sampling), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and cytology between the ages of 25 and 50 years, at frequencies of once to three times in a lifetime, at 5- and 10-year intervals. Screening with careHPV (cervical sampling) was the most effective and cost-effective strategy in all settings; careHPV (vaginal sampling) was only slightly less effective. The most critical ages for screening are between ages 30 and 45 years. Within this age range, screening at certain ages may be relatively more cost-effective, but cancer risk reductions are similar for a given screening test and interval. Screening three times between 30 and 45 years was very cost-effective and reduced cancer risk by ~50%.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, GDP, gross domestic product, HPV, human papillomavirus, I$, international dollar, ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid, WHO, World Health Organization, YLS, year of life saved, Cancer screening, Human papillomavirus (HPV), Cervical cancer, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Visual inspection with acetic acid

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories