Publication: Traction force microscopy of engineered cardiac tissues
Open/View Files
Date
2018
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Pasqualini, Francesco Silvio, Ashutosh Agarwal, Blakely Bussie O'Connor, Qihan Liu, Sean P. Sheehy, and Kevin Kit Parker. 2018. “Traction force microscopy of engineered cardiac tissues.” PLoS ONE 13 (3): e0194706. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194706.
Research Data
Abstract
Cardiac tissue development and pathology have been shown to depend sensitively on microenvironmental mechanical factors, such as extracellular matrix stiffness, in both in vivo and in vitro systems. We present a novel quantitative approach to assess cardiac structure and function by extending the classical traction force microscopy technique to tissue-level preparations. Using this system, we investigated the relationship between contractile proficiency and metabolism in neonate rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) cultured on gels with stiffness mimicking soft immature (1 kPa), normal healthy (13 kPa), and stiff diseased (90 kPa) cardiac microenvironments. We found that tissues engineered on the softest gels generated the least amount of stress and had the smallest work output. Conversely, cardiomyocytes in tissues engineered on healthy- and disease-mimicking gels generated significantly higher stresses, with the maximal contractile work measured in NRVM engineered on gels of normal stiffness. Interestingly, although tissues on soft gels exhibited poor stress generation and work production, their basal metabolic respiration rate was significantly more elevated than in other groups, suggesting a highly ineffective coupling between energy production and contractile work output. Our novel platform can thus be utilized to quantitatively assess the mechanotransduction pathways that initiate tissue-level structural and functional remodeling in response to substrate stiffness.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Physical Sciences, Materials Science, Material Properties, Mechanical Properties, Stiffness, Materials by Structure, Amorphous Solids, Gels, Mixtures, Biology and Life Sciences, Physiology, Muscle Physiology, Muscle Contraction, Medicine and Health Sciences, Science Policy, Science and Technology Workforce, Careers in Research, Engineers, People and Places, Population Groupings, Professions, Cell Biology, Cellular Types, Animal Cells, Muscle Cells, Anatomy, Biological Tissue, Muscle Tissue, Biotechnology, Bioengineering, Tissue Engineering, Engineering and Technology, Myofibrils, Sarcomeres, Cell Physiology
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service