Publication:
Points to consider for sharing variant-level information from clinical genetic testing with ClinVar

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2018

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Azzariti, Danielle R., Erin Rooney Riggs, Annie Niehaus, Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Erin M. Ramos, Brandi Kattman, Melissa J. Landrum, Christa L. Martin, and Heidi L. Rehm. 2018. “Points to consider for sharing variant-level information from clinical genetic testing with ClinVar.” Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies 4 (1): a002345. doi:10.1101/mcs.a002345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a002345.

Research Data

Abstract

Data sharing between laboratories, clinicians, researchers, and patients is essential for improvements and standardization in genomic medicine; encouraging genomic data sharing (GDS) is a key activity of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). The ClinGen initiative is dedicated to evaluating the clinical relevance of genes and variants for use in precision medicine and research. Currently, data originating from each of the aforementioned stakeholder groups is represented in ClinVar, a publicly available repository of genomic variation, and its relationship to human health hosted by the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the NIH. Although policies such as the 2014 NIH GDS policy are clear regarding the mandate for informed consent for broad data sharing from research participants, no clear guidance exists on the level of consent appropriate for the sharing of information obtained through clinical testing to advance knowledge. ClinGen has collaborated with ClinVar and the National Human Genome Research Institute to develop points to consider for clinical laboratories on sharing de-identified variant-level data in light of both the NIH GDS policy and the recent updates to the Common Rule. We propose specific data elements from interpreted genomic variants that are appropriate for submission to ClinVar when direct patient consent was not sought and describe situations in which obtaining informed consent is recommended.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories