Publication:
Spaced education in medical residents: An electronic intervention to improve competency and retention of medical knowledge

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Matos, Jason, Camille R. Petri, Kenneth J. Mukamal, and Anita Vanka. 2017. “Spaced education in medical residents: An electronic intervention to improve competency and retention of medical knowledge.” PLoS ONE 12 (7): e0181418. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181418.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Spaced education is a novel method that improves medical education through online repetition of core principles often paired with multiple-choice questions. This model is a proven teaching tool for medical students, but its effect on resident learning is less established. We hypothesized that repetition of key clinical concepts in a “Clinical Pearls” format would improve knowledge retention in medical residents. Methods: This study investigated spaced education with particular emphasis on using a novel, email-based reinforcement program, and a randomized, self-matched design, in which residents were quizzed on medical knowledge that was either reinforced or not with electronically-administered spaced education. Both reinforced and non-reinforced knowledge was later tested with four quizzes. Results: Overall, respondents incorrectly answered 395 of 1008 questions (0.39; 95% CI, 0.36–0.42). Incorrect response rates varied by quiz (range 0.34–0.49; p = 0.02), but not significantly by post-graduate year (PGY1 0.44, PGY2 0.33, PGY3 0.38; p = 0.08). Although there was no evidence of benefit among residents (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.83–1.22; p = 0.95), we observed a significantly lower risk of incorrect responses to reinforced material among interns (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70–0.99, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Overall, repetition of Clinical Pearls did not statistically improve test scores amongst junior and senior residents. However, among interns, repetition of the Clinical Pearls was associated with significantly higher test scores, perhaps reflecting their greater attendance at didactic sessions and engagement with Clinical Pearls. Although the study was limited by a low response rate, we employed test and control questions within the same quiz, limiting the potential for selection bias. Further work is needed to determine the optimal spacing and content load of Clinical Pearls to maximize retention amongst medical residents. This particular protocol of spaced education, however, was unique and readily reproducible suggesting its potential efficacy for intern education within a large residency program.

Description

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Pediatrics, Biology and Life Sciences, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Psychology, Learning, Human Learning, Psychology, Social Sciences, Learning and Memory, Sociology, Education, Lectures, Medical Education, Medical Humanities, Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures, Pediatric Surgery, Agriculture, Animal Products, Pearls, Earth Sciences, Mineralogy, Minerals, Gemstones, Survey Research, Surveys, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Statistics (Mathematics), Confidence Intervals

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories