Publication:
Evidence‐based policy choices for efficient and equitable cervical cancer screening programs in low‐resource settings

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Campos, Nicole G., Vivien Tsu, Jose Jeronimo, Mercy Mvundura, and Jane J. Kim. 2017. “Evidence‐based policy choices for efficient and equitable cervical cancer screening programs in low‐resource settings.” Cancer Medicine 6 (8): 2008-2014. doi:10.1002/cam4.1123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1123.

Research Data

Abstract

Abstract Women in developing countries disproportionately bear the burden of cervical cancer. The availability of prophylactic vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18, which cause approximately 70% of cervical cancers, provides reason for optimism as roll‐out begins with support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. However, for the hundreds of millions of women beyond the target age for HPV vaccination, cervical cancer screening to detect and treat precancerous lesions remains the only form of prevention. Here we describe the challenges that confront screening programs in low‐resource settings, including (1) optimizing screening test effectiveness; (2) achieving high screening coverage of the target population; and (3) managing screen‐positive women. For each of these challenges, we summarize the tradeoffs between resource utilization and programmatic attributes. We then highlight opportunities for efficient and equitable programming, with supporting evidence from recent mathematical modeling analyses informed by data from the PATH demonstration projects in India, Nicaragua, and Uganda.

Description

Keywords

Commentary, cancer screening, cervical cancer, cost‐effectiveness analysis, health policy

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories