Publication:
Harmonization of community health worker programs for HIV: A four-country qualitative study in Southern Africa

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

De Neve, Jan-Walter, Henri Garrison-Desany, Kathryn G. Andrews, Nour Sharara, Chantelle Boudreaux, Roopan Gill, Pascal Geldsetzer, Maria Vaikath, Till Bärnighausen, and Thomas J. Bossert. 2017. “Harmonization of community health worker programs for HIV: A four-country qualitative study in Southern Africa.” PLoS Medicine 14 (8): e1002374. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002374.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Community health worker (CHW) programs are believed to be poorly coordinated, poorly integrated into national health systems, and lacking long-term support. Duplication of services, fragmentation, and resource limitations may have impeded the potential impact of CHWs for achieving HIV goals. This study assesses mediators of a more harmonized approach to implementing large-scale CHW programs for HIV in the context of complex health systems and multiple donors. Methods and findings We undertook four country case studies in Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa, and Swaziland between August 2015 and May 2016. We conducted 60 semistructured interviews with donors, government officials, and expert observers involved in CHW programs delivering HIV services. Interviews were triangulated with published literature, country reports, national health plans, and policies. Data were analyzed based on 3 priority areas of harmonization (coordination, integration, and sustainability) and 5 components of a conceptual framework (the health issue, intervention, stakeholders, health system, and context) to assess facilitators and barriers to harmonization of CHW programs. CHWs supporting HIV programs were found to be highly fragmented and poorly integrated into national health systems. Stakeholders generally supported increasing harmonization, although they recognized several challenges and disadvantages to harmonization. Key facilitators to harmonization included (i) a large existing national CHW program and recognition of nongovernmental CHW programs, (ii) use of common incentives and training processes for CHWs, (iii) existence of an organizational structure dedicated to community health initiatives, and (iv) involvement of community leaders in decision-making. Key barriers included a wide range of stakeholders and lack of ownership and accountability of non-governmental CHW programs. Limitations of our study include subjectively selected case studies, our focus on decision-makers, and limited generalizability beyond the countries analyzed. Conclusion: CHW programs for HIV in Southern Africa are fragmented, poorly integrated, and lack long-term support. We provide 5 policy recommendations to harmonize CHW programs in order to strengthen and sustain the role of CHWs in HIV service delivery.

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Microbiology, Medical Microbiology, Microbial Pathogens, Viral Pathogens, Immunodeficiency Viruses, HIV, Medicine and Health Sciences, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pathogens, Organisms, Viruses, Biology and life sciences, RNA viruses, Retroviruses, Lentivirus, Health Care, Health Care Policy, Health Systems Strengthening, Social Sciences, Political Science, Political Aspects of Health, Medicine and health sciences, Epidemiology, HIV epidemiology, People and places, Geographical locations, Africa, South Africa, People and Places, Geographical Locations, Swaziland, Health Services Administration and Management, Lesotho

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories