Publication:
Topical v Systemic Agent Treatment for Papulopustular Acne: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

No Thumbnail Available

Date

1984-12

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Stern, Robert, Theodore M. Pass, Anthony Komaroff. "Topical v Systemic Agent Treatment for Papulopustular Acne: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis." Archives of Dermatology 120, no. 12 (1984): 1571-1578. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1984.01650480033013

Research Data

Abstract

We used cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the costs, risks, and benefits of two strategies for clearing papulopustular acne; topical therapy alone as initial therapy or a combination of systemic antibiotics and topical agents used at the first visit. Patients treated with combination therapy had fewer weeks of morbidity from acne, and lower dollar costs but have a greater risk of side effects. If the topical therapy alone was chosen to reduce the risk of side effects in a population of patients there would be an additional $764 in costs and 238 weeks of morbidity from acne to avert a single additional instance of side effects. Initial treatment of papulopustular acne with combined oral antibiotics and topical agents thus seems to be cost-effective. After clearing is achieved, maintenance therapy with topical agents should be considered.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Dermatology, General Medicine

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories