Publication:

Cancer treatment in the last 6 months of life: when inaction can outperform action

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2018

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cancer Intelligence
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Gyawali, Bishal, and Saroj Niraula. 2018. “Cancer treatment in the last 6 months of life: when inaction can outperform action.” ecancermedicalscience 12 (1): 826. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2018.826. http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.826.

Abstract

When an investigational anticancer drug is being tested, demonstration of improvement in overall survival (OS) will generally lead to regulatory approval. However, the value that improvement in OS adds to patients’ lives is guided largely by the context of the improvement and accompanying trade-offs. For example, when a patient’s life expectancy is less than 6 months, many oncologists will not embark on any active cancer treatments. However, multiple new anticancer drugs have been approved recently after being tested in end-stage cancer patients and demonstrating median OS in the experimental arm close to 6 months. Such practice, particularly when the treatment is also accompanied by serious toxicities and cost, can undermine a peaceful life-death transition. In this commentary, we review regulatory approvals in the last 5 years and the ethical considerations involved in testing active cancer treatment in terminal cancer patients.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

end of life, financial toxicity, overall survival, serious adverse events, fatal adverse events

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories