Publication: Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist
Open/View Files
Date
2018
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Sepucha, K. R., P. Abhyankar, A. S. Hoffman, H. L. Bekker, A. LeBlanc, C. A. Levin, M. Ropka, et al. 2018. “Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.” BMJ Quality & Safety 27 (5): 380-388. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: Patient decision aids (PDAs) are evidence-based tools designed to help patients make specific and deliberated choices among healthcare options. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration review papers and Cochrane systematic review of PDAs have found significant gaps in the reporting of evaluations of PDAs, including poor or limited reporting of PDA content, development methods and delivery. This study sought to develop and reach consensus on reporting guidelines to improve the quality of publications evaluating PDAs. Methods: An international workgroup, consisting of members from IPDAS Collaboration, followed established methods to develop reporting guidelines for PDA evaluation studies. This paper describes the results from three completed phases: (1) planning, (2) drafting and (3) consensus, which included a modified, two-stage, online international Delphi process. The work was conducted over 2 years with bimonthly conference calls and three in-person meetings. The workgroup used input from these phases to produce a final set of recommended items in the form of a checklist. Results: The SUNDAE Checklist (Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations) includes 26 items recommended for studies reporting evaluations of PDAs. In the two-stage Delphi process, 117/143 (82%) experts from 14 countries completed round 1 and 96/117 (82%) completed round 2. Respondents reached a high level of consensus on the importance of the items and indicated strong willingness to use the items when reporting PDA studies. Conclusion: The SUNDAE Checklist will help ensure that reports of PDA evaluation studies are understandable, transparent and of high quality. A separate Explanation and Elaboration publication provides additional details to support use of the checklist.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
shared decision making, patient-centred care, checklists, patient education
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service