Publication:

A novel early risk assessment tool for detecting clinical outcomes in patients with heat-related illness (J-ERATO score): Development and validation in independent cohorts in Japan

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Hayashida, Kei, Yutaka Kondo, Toru Hifumi, Junya Shimazaki, Yasutaka Oda, Shinichiro Shiraishi, Tatsuma Fukuda, Junichi Sasaki, and Keiki Shimizu. 2018. “A novel early risk assessment tool for detecting clinical outcomes in patients with heat-related illness (J-ERATO score): Development and validation in independent cohorts in Japan.” PLoS ONE 13 (5): e0197032. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197032.

Abstract

Background: We sought to develop a novel risk assessment tool to predict the clinical outcomes after heat-related illness. Methods: Prospective, multicenter observational study. Patients who transferred to emergency hospitals in Japan with heat-related illness were registered. The sample was divided into two parts: 60% to construct the score and 40% to validate it. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict hospital admission as a primary outcome. The resulting model was transformed into a scoring system. Results: A total of 3,001 eligible patients were analyzed. There was no difference in variables between development and validation cohorts. Based on the result of a logistic regression model in the development phase (n = 1,805), the J-ERATO score was defined as the sum of the six binary components in the prehospital setting (respiratory rate≥22 /min, Glasgow coma scale<15, systolic blood pressure≤100 mmHg, heart rate≥100 bpm, body temperature≥38°C, and age≥65 y), for a total score ranging from 0 to 6. In the validation phase (n = 1,196), the score had excellent discrimination (C-statistic 0.84; 95% CI 0.79–0.89, p<0.0001) and calibration (P>0.2 by Hosmer-Lemeshow test). The observed proportion of hospital admission increased with increasing J-ERATO score (score = 0, 5.0%; score = 1, 15.0%; score = 2, 24.6%; score = 3, 38.6%; score = 4, 68.0%; score = 5, 85.2%; score = 6, 96.4%). Multivariate analyses showed that the J-ERATO score was an independent positive predictor of hospital admission (adjusted OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.06–2.87; P<0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (3.73; 2.95–4.72; P<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (1.65; 1.18–2.32; P = 0.004). Conclusions: The J-ERATO score is simply assessed and can facilitate the identification of patients with higher risk of heat-related hospitalization. This scoring system is also significantly associated with the higher likelihood of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality after heat-related hospitalization.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Health Care, Health Care Facilities, Hospitals, Pediatrics, Biology and Life Sciences, Physiology, Physiological Parameters, Body Temperature, Oral Medicine, People and Places, Geographical Locations, Asia, Japan, Earth Sciences, Geography, Geographic Areas, Urban Areas, Social Sciences, Sociology, Education, Medical Education, Medical Humanities

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories