Publication:
Gray blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance for improved detection of myocardial scar

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Fahmy, Ahmed S., Ulf Neisius, Connie W. Tsao, Sophie Berg, Elizabeth Goddu, Patrick Pierce, Tamer A. Basha, Long Ngo, Warren J. Manning, and Reza Nezafat. 2018. “Gray blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance for improved detection of myocardial scar.” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 20 (1): 22. doi:10.1186/s12968-018-0442-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0442-2.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Low scar-to-blood contrast in late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MRI limits the visualization of scars adjacent to the blood pool. Nulling the blood signal improves scar detection but results in lack of contrast between myocardium and blood, which makes clinical evaluation of LGE images more difficult. Methods: GB-LGE contrast is achieved through partial suppression of the blood signal using T2 magnetization preparation between the inversion pulse and acquisition. The timing parameters of GB-LGE sequence are determined by optimizing a cost-function representing the desired tissue contrast. The proposed 3D GB-LGE sequence was evaluated using phantoms, human subjects (n = 45) and a swine model of myocardial infarction (n = 5). Two independent readers subjectively evaluated the image quality and ability to identify and localize scarring in GB-LGE compared to black-blood LGE (BB-LGE) (i.e., with complete blood nulling) and conventional (bright-blood) LGE. Results: GB-LGE contrast was successfully generated in phantoms and all in-vivo scans. The scar-to-blood contrast was improved in GB-LGE compared to conventional LGE in humans (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) and in animals (1.5 ± 0.2 vs. -0.03 ± 0.2). In patients, GB-LGE detected more tissue scarring compared to BB-LGE and conventional LGE. The subjective scores of the GB-LGE ability for localizing LV scar and detecting papillary scar were improved as compared with both BB-LGE (P < 0.024) and conventional LGE (P < 0.001). In the swine infarction model, GB-LGE scores for the ability to localize LV scar scores were consistently higher than those of both BB-LGE and conventional-LGE. Conclusion: GB-LGE imaging improves the ability to identify and localize myocardial scarring compared to both BB-LGE and conventional LGE. Further studies are warranted to histologically validate GB-LGE. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12968-018-0442-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Keywords

Late gadolinium enhancement, Blood suppression, Myocardial viability, Myocardial infarction

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories