Publication:

In Vivo Brain Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Measurement of Biomarker Sensitivity to Post-Processing Algorithms

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

IEEE
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Cocuzzo, Daniel, Alexander Lin, Peter Stanwell, Carolyn Mountford, and Nirmal Keshava. 2014. “In Vivo Brain Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Measurement of Biomarker Sensitivity to Post-Processing Algorithms.” IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine 2 (1): 2900117. doi:10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2309333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2309333.

Abstract

Clinical translation of reported biomarkers requires reliable and consistent algorithms to derive biomarkers. However, the literature reports statistically significant differences between 1-D MRS measurements from control groups and subjects with disease states but frequently provides little information on the algorithms and parameters used to process the data. The sensitivity of in vivo brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy biomarkers is investigated with respect to parameter values for two key stages of post-acquisitional processing. Our effort is specifically motivated by the lack of consensus on approaches and parameter values for the two critical operations, water resonance removal, and baseline correction. The different stages of data processing also introduce varying levels of uncertainty and arbitrary selection of parameter values can significantly underutilize the intrinsic differences between two classes of signals. The sensitivity of biomarkers points to the need for a better understanding of how all stages of post-acquisitional processing affect biomarker discovery and ultimately, clinical translation. Our results also highlight the possibility of optimizing biomarker discovery by the careful selection of parameters that best reveal class differences. Using previously reported data and biomarkers, our results demonstrate that small changes in parameter values affect the statistical significance and corresponding effect size of biomarkers. Consequently, it is possible to increase the strength of biomarkers by selecting optimal parameter values in different spectral intervals. Our analyses with a previously reported data set demonstrate an increase in effect sizes for wavelet-based biomarkers of up to 36%, with increases in classification performance of up to 12%.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, biomarkers, sensitivity, neuroimaging, statistical significance

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories