Publication: Emergency department point-of-care ultrasonography improves time to pericardiocentesis for clinically significant effusions
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Alpert, Evan Avraham, Uri Amit, Larisa Guranda, Rafea Mahagna, Shamai A. Grossman, and Ariel Bentancur. 2017. “Emergency department point-of-care ultrasonography improves time to pericardiocentesis for clinically significant effusions.” Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 4 (3): 128-132. doi:10.15441/ceem.16.169. http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.16.169.
Research Data
Abstract
Objective: Our objective was to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify and guide treatment of tamponade or clinically significant pericardial effusions in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of non-trauma patients who were diagnosed with large pericardial effusions or tamponade by the ED physician using POCUS. The control group was composed of those patients later diagnosed on the medical wards or incidentally in the ED by other means such as a computed tomography. The following data were abstracted from the patient’s file: demographics, medical background, electrocardiogram results, chest radiograph readings, echocardiogram results, and patient outcomes. Results: There were 18 patients in the POCUS arm and 55 in the control group. The POCUS arm had a decreased time to pericardiocentesis (11.3 vs. 70.2 hours, P=0.055) as well as a shorter length of stay (5.1 vs. 7.0 days, P=0.222). A decreased volume of pericardial fluid was drained (661 vs. 826 mL, P=0.139) in the group diagnosed by POCUS. Conclusion: This study suggests that POCUS may effectively identify pericardial effusions and guide appropriate treatment, leading to a decreased time to pericardiocentesis and decreased length of hospital stay. Pericardial tamponade or a large pericardial effusion should be considered in all patients presenting to the ED with clinical, radiographic, or electrocardiographic signs of cardiovascular compromise.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Cardiac tamponade, Ultrasonography, Emergencies
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service