Publication: Topography and Determinants of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)‐Visible Perivascular Spaces in a Large Memory Clinic Cohort
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Shams, Sara, Juha Martola, Andreas Charidimou, Mykol Larvie, Tobias Granberg, Mana Shams, Maria Kristoffersen‐Wiberg, and Lars‐Olof Wahlund. 2017. “Topography and Determinants of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)‐Visible Perivascular Spaces in a Large Memory Clinic Cohort.” Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 6 (9): e006279. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006279.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging‐visible perivascular spaces (PVS) are related to interstitial fluid clearance pathways (including amyloid‐β) in the brain and are suggested to be a marker of cerebral small vessel disease. We investigated the role, topography, and possible implications of PVS in cognitive impairment. Methods and Results: A total of 1504 patients undergoing memory clinic investigation and an associated brain magnetic resonance imaging scan were included in this cross‐sectional study. Magnetic resonance images were assessed for markers of small vessel disease. Additionally, 1039 patients had cerebrospinal fluid analysis of amyloid‐β 42, total tau (T‐tau), and phosphorylated tau (P‐tau); 520 patients had apoE genotyping done. Results were analyzed with generalized linear models. A total of 289 (19%; 95% confidence interval, 17–21) had a high‐grade PVS in the centrum semiovale (CSO) and 65 (4%; 95% confidence interval: 3%–5%) in the basal ganglia (BG). Centrum semiovale– and BG‐PVS were both associated with high age (P<0.001), hypertension (P<0.001), probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy (P<0.05), moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities (P<0.001), cortical superficial siderosis (P<0.001), cerebral microbleeds (P<0.001), and PVS. centrum semiovale–PVS was separately associated with strictly lobar cerebral microbleeds (P=0.057). BG‐PVS was associated with strictly deep cerebral microbleeds (P<0.001), lacunes (P<0.001), and vascular dementia (P=0.04). BG‐PVS showed a tendency to be associated with high cerebrospinal fluid tau (B=0.002, P=0.04) in the whole cohort and in Alzheimer's disease (B=0.005; P=0.02). No other associations with cerebrospinal fluid or the apoE e4 allele was observed. Conclusions: Centrum semiovale–PVS and BG‐PVS have different underlying etiology, being associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hypertensive vasculopathy, respectively, although a significant overlap between these pathologies is likely to exist.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
cerebral microbleed, cerebral small vessel disease, cognitive impairment, magnetic resonance imaging, Vascular Disease, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Cognitive Impairment, Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service