Publication:
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: Pilot Implementation of a Near‐Real‐Time Monitoring Program in Italy

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2018

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Mayer, Flavia, Ursula Kirchmayer, Paola Coletta, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Giovanna Cappai, Mirko Di Martino, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Marina Davoli, and Elisabetta Patorno. 2018. “Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: Pilot Implementation of a Near‐Real‐Time Monitoring Program in Italy.” Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 7 (6): e008034. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.008034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008034.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Real‐time monitoring is used to the ends of postmarketing observational research on newly marketed drugs. We implemented a pilot near‐real‐time monitoring program on the test case of oral anticoagulants. Specifically, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation secondary prevention during 2013‐2015 in the Lazio Region, Italy. Methods and Results: A cohort study was conducted using a sequential propensity‐score–matched new user parallel‐cohort design. Sequential analyses were performed using Cox models. Overall, 10 742 patients contributed to the analyses. Compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with a reduction of all‐cause mortality (0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66‐0.99), cardiovascular mortality (0.71; 95% CI 0.54‐0.93), myocardial infarction (0.67; 95% CI 0.43‐1.04), ischemic stroke (0.87; 95% CI 0.52‐1.45), hemorrhagic stroke (0.25; 95% CI 0.07‐0.88), and with a nonsignificant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding (1.26; 95% CI 0.69‐2.30). Conclusions: The present pilot study is a cornerstone to develop real‐time monitoring for new drugs in our region.

Description

Keywords

anticoagulant, comparative effectiveness, drug therapy, monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, pilot, real‐world, surveillance, Mortality/Survival, Quality and Outcomes, Complications, Secondary Prevention, Epidemiology

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories