Publication:

Perspectives of Family Members Participating in Cultural Assessment of Psychiatric Disorders: Findings From the DSM-5 International Field Trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2015-02

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Informa UK Limited
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Hinton, Ladson, Neil Aggarwal, Ana-Maria Iosif, Mitchell Weiss, Vasudeo Paralikar, Smita Deshpande, Sushrut Jadhav et al. "Perspectives of Family Members Participating in Cultural Assessment of Psychiatric Disorders: Findings From the DSM-5 International Field Trial." International Review of Psychiatry 27, no. 1 (2015): 3-10. DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2014.995072

Abstract

Despite the important roles families play in the lives of many persons with mental illness across cultures, there is a dearth of data worldwide on how family members perceive the process of cultural assessment as well as to how to best include them. This study addresses this gap in our knowledge through analysis of data collected across six countries as part of a DSM-5 Field Trial of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI). At clinician discretion, individuals who accompanied patients to the clinic visit (i.e. patient companions) at the time the CFI was conducted were invited to participate in the cultural assessment and answer questions about their experience. The specific aims of this paper are (1) to describe patterns of participation of patient companions in the CFI across the six countries, and (2) to examine the comparative feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of the CFI from companion perspectives through analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data. Among the 321 patient interviews, only 86 (at 4 of 12 sites) included companions, all of whom were family members or other relatives. The utility, feasibility and acceptability of the CFI were rated favorably by relatives, supported by qualitative analyses of debriefing interviews. Cross-site differences in frequency of accompaniment merit further study.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Psychiatry

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories