Publication: Neurobiological Indicators of Disinhibition in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2015-08
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Sadeh, Naomi, Jeffrey M. Spielberg, Mark Miller, William Milberg, David Salat, Melissa M. Amick, Catherine Fortier et al. "Neurobiological Indicators of Disinhibition in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder." Human Brain Mapping 36, no. 8 (2015): 3076-3086. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22829
Research Data
Abstract
Deficits in impulse control are increasingly recognized in association with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To our further understanding of the neurobiology of PTSD‐related disinhibition, we examined alterations in brain morphology and network connectivity associated with response inhibition failures and PTSD severity. The sample consisted of 189 trauma‐exposed Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans (89% male, ages 19–62) presenting with a range of current PTSD severity. Disinhibition was measured using commission errors on a Go/No‐Go (GNG) task with emotional stimuli, and PTSD was assessed using a measure of current symptom severity. Whole‐brain vertex‐wise analyses of cortical thickness revealed two clusters associated with PTSD‐related disinhibition (Monte Carlo cluster corrected P < 0.05). The first cluster included portions of right inferior and middle frontal gyri and frontal pole. The second cluster spanned portions of left medial orbital frontal, rostral anterior cingulate, and superior frontal gyrus. In both clusters, commission errors were associated with reduced cortical thickness at higher (but not lower) levels of PTSD symptoms. Resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses revealed alterations in the functional connectivity of the right frontal cluster. Together, study findings suggest that reductions in cortical thickness in regions involved in flexible decision‐making, emotion regulation, and response inhibition contribute to impulse control deficits in PTSD. Furthermore, aberrant coupling between frontal regions and networks involved in selective attention, memory/learning, and response preparation suggest disruptions in functional connectivity may also play a role.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service