Publication: Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2003
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Budtz-Jørgensen, Esben, Niels Keiding, Philippe Grandjean, Pal Weihe, and Roberta F. White. 2003. “Consequences of Exposure Measurement Error for Confounder Identification in Environmental Epidemiology.” Statistics in Medicine 22 (19) (September 8): 3089–3100. doi:10.1002/sim.1541.
Abstract
Non-differential measurement error in the exposure variable is known to attenuate the dose–response relationship. The amount of attenuation introduced in a given situation is not only a function of the precision of the exposure measurement but also depends on the conditional variance of the true exposure given the other independent variables. In addition, confounder effects may also be affected by the exposure measurement error. These difficulties in statistical model development are illustrated by examples from a epidemiological study performed in the Faroe Islands to investigate the adverse health effects of prenatal mercury exposure.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service