Publication:

Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2003

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Budtz-Jørgensen, Esben, Niels Keiding, Philippe Grandjean, Pal Weihe, and Roberta F. White. 2003. “Consequences of Exposure Measurement Error for Confounder Identification in Environmental Epidemiology.” Statistics in Medicine 22 (19) (September 8): 3089–3100. doi:10.1002/sim.1541.

Abstract

Non-differential measurement error in the exposure variable is known to attenuate the dose–response relationship. The amount of attenuation introduced in a given situation is not only a function of the precision of the exposure measurement but also depends on the conditional variance of the true exposure given the other independent variables. In addition, confounder effects may also be affected by the exposure measurement error. These difficulties in statistical model development are illustrated by examples from a epidemiological study performed in the Faroe Islands to investigate the adverse health effects of prenatal mercury exposure.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories