Publication:
Predictive representations can link model-based reinforcement learning to model-free mechanisms

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Russek, Evan M., Ida Momennejad, Matthew M. Botvinick, Samuel J. Gershman, and Nathaniel D. Daw. 2017. “Predictive representations can link model-based reinforcement learning to model-free mechanisms.” PLoS Computational Biology 13 (9): e1005768. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005768.

Research Data

Abstract

Humans and animals are capable of evaluating actions by considering their long-run future rewards through a process described using model-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. The mechanisms by which neural circuits perform the computations prescribed by model-based RL remain largely unknown; however, multiple lines of evidence suggest that neural circuits supporting model-based behavior are structurally homologous to and overlapping with those thought to carry out model-free temporal difference (TD) learning. Here, we lay out a family of approaches by which model-based computation may be built upon a core of TD learning. The foundation of this framework is the successor representation, a predictive state representation that, when combined with TD learning of value predictions, can produce a subset of the behaviors associated with model-based learning, while requiring less decision-time computation than dynamic programming. Using simulations, we delineate the precise behavioral capabilities enabled by evaluating actions using this approach, and compare them to those demonstrated by biological organisms. We then introduce two new algorithms that build upon the successor representation while progressively mitigating its limitations. Because this framework can account for the full range of observed putatively model-based behaviors while still utilizing a core TD framework, we suggest that it represents a neurally plausible family of mechanisms for model-based evaluation.

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Psychology, Learning, Psychology, Social Sciences, Learning and Memory, Physical Sciences, Chemistry, Chemical Compounds, Organic Compounds, Amines, Catecholamines, Dopamine, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Neurochemistry, Neurotransmitters, Biogenic Amines, Hormones, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Algorithms, Simulation and Modeling, Behavior, Anatomy, Brain, Neostriatum, Medicine and Health Sciences, Decision Making, Cognition, Neurochemicals, Dopaminergics, Animal Behavior, Zoology

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories