Publication:
In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction

Thumbnail Image

Date

2008

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Nature
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Lane, Clayton G., Russell F. Warren, Fatima C. Stanford, Daniel Kendoff, and Andrew D. Pearle. 2008. “In Vivo Analysis of the Pivot Shift Phenomenon During Computer Navigated ACL Reconstruction.” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 16 (5) (March 1): 487–492. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0504-3.

Research Data

Abstract

Abstract ACL insufficiency can be documented clinically with the pivot shift maneuver, but the specific pathologic kinematics of the pivot shift is difficult to quantify. Navi- gation provides an opportunity to analyze in vivo the motions that comprise the pivot shift and the kinematic changes that are inherent after ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that tibial rotation, anterior tibial translation (ATT), acceleration of posterior translation (APT) and the newly described angle of P, quantified during navigated pivot shift examination, correlate with clinical grading of the pivot shift phenomena. Navigation data from 12 patients who underwent navigated ACL surgery were retrospectively reviewed. A characteristic P-shaped track of motion is recorded by the navigation software during the pivot-shift examination. The ‘‘angle of P’’ was developed as a means characterizing this track of motion and was measured in all cases. The tibial rotation, maximum anterior tibial translation and acceleration of posterior translation during the pivot shift were also mea- sured. The charts of these patients were reviewed to obtaininformation on the clinical grading of the pivot-shift before and after ACL reconstruction. Spearman correlation analysis was then used to identify significant correlations between clinical grade of the pivot shift and the angle of p measured with computer navigation. After reconstruction, the clinical grade of the pivot shift was zero in all patients. The tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and the angle of p also decreased. On analysis of 24 EUAs, 12 before reconstruction and 12 after, there was excellent and significant correlation between the clinical grade of pivot shift examination and the angle of P (R2 = 0.97, p \ 0.001). Only good correlation was noted between the clinical pivot shift and the rotation (R2 = 0.77, p \ 0.0001), maximum ATT (R2 = 0.87, p \ 0.0001) and APT (R2 = 0.81, p \ 0.0001). There was a stepwise increase of 6–7 mm of translation and 5–6° of rotation for each increasing grade of pivot shift. There were also increases in the angle of P and APT for each increasing grade of pivot. A decrease in tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and angle of p is detected by computer navigation with ACL reconstruction, correlating with clinical grading. Clinical quantification of the distinct elements of the pivot shift may allow for more accurate evaluation of different ACL reconstruction constructs. There is also potential for these variables to be measured intraoperatively and guide ACL reconstruction when computer navigation is employed.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories