Publication:

Multicenter comparison of laboratory performance in cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viral load testing using international standards

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Rychert, Jenna, Lara Danziger-Isakov, Belinda Yen-Lieberman, Gregory Storch, Richard Buller, Stewart C. Sweet, Aneesh K. Mehta, et al. 2014. “Multicenter Comparison of Laboratory Performance in Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Viral Load Testing Using International Standards.” Clinical Transplantation 28 (12) (November 13): 1416–1423. doi:10.1111/ctr.12473.

Abstract

Background—Infections with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) remain important in solid organ transplantation. Quantitative viral nucleic acid testing is a major advance to patient management. These assays are limited by a lack of standardization, resulting in viral load measurements that differ among clinical laboratories. The variability in viral load measurements makes interpretation of multicenter clinical trials data difficult. This study compares the current practices in CMV and EBV viral load testing at four large transplant centers participating in multicenter Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (CTOT/CTOTC).

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, viral load, quantitative nucleic acid testing, WHO standards, clinical trial

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories