Publication:
Why The Ghostlight? Theatrical Superstition, Ritual, and Sacred Space

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2021-10-15

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Collins Bandes, Patsy. 2021. Why The Ghostlight? Theatrical Superstition, Ritual, and Sacred Space. Master's thesis, Harvard University Division of Continuing Education.

Research Data

Abstract

Theater artists have long practiced superstitions and rituals such as leaving a light onstage to keep ghosts from taking up residence in the theater or not saying the name of the play Macbeth for fear of being cursed. The question we must ask is why? And what purpose do these rituals serve? By examining the history of the lineage of these superstitions through the lens of both practitioners such as Tony Church and Richard Huggett and theatrical scholars Gabriel Egan and Aoife Monks and looking at cultural and religious practices through the work of Victor Turner and Mircea Eliade, we see that the practices of superstition and ritual create the bonds of a community. In addition, they are part of what sanctifies a space, or prepares it for performance. In this sacred space, the performers and audience together can be transformed by their collective and communal experience. Through the lenses of communications theorist James W. Carey and Jacques Ranciere we can look at artists and movements who have pushed back against mere transmission of information or the spectacle theater to create ritual communication and communal processes engaging both practitioners and audiences. But can that transformational space exist in a virtual medium? When the global COVID-19 pandemic forced theater-makers to move their work online, the collective now existed digitally. Theorist John Perry Barlow of the Electronic Frontier Foundation defines cyberspace as a digital web where participants interact, and Jaron Lanier argues that it is merely the sum of its users. While both speak about it as if it is a space, it is metaphorical, not tangible. The question that must be asked is whether community and sacred space can be created in a digital format or is a physical environment a necessity for the creation of a sacred space and a community to create within it?

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

ritual, sacred space, superstition, virtual theater, Theater, Theater history, Performing arts

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories