Publication:

Brief of Library Amici Curiae (ALA, ACRL, LFI, ARL, SPN, EveryLibrary)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2022-06

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Council Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Brief for ALA, ACRL, LFI, ARL, SPN, EveryLibrary as Amici Curiae, Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, S. Ct. 21-869 (2022)

Abstract

The Court’s decision in this case may bear directly on the interests of visual artists who rely on existing works as raw material for their own creations, but it could also affect far more. As the Court considers how to decide this case in light of its deep and recently reaffirmed commitment to a robust fair use doctrine, it should keep in mind the substantial progress enabled by its past decisions. In particular, it should consider the interests of some of fair use’s core beneficiaries: libraries, archives, cultural heritage institutions, and their users.

Description

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (No. 21-869)

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories