Publication: The Central X‐Ray Point Source in Cassiopeia A
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2001
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Chakrabarty, Deepto, Michael J. Pivovaroff, Lars E. Hernquist, Jeremy S. Heyl, and Ramesh Narayan. 2001. “The Central X‐Ray Point Source in Cassiopeia A.” The Astrophysical Journal 548 (2): 800–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/318994.
Research Data
Abstract
The spectacular "first light" observation by the Chandra X-Ray Observatory revealed an X-ray point source near the center of the 300 yr old Cas A supernova remnant. We present an analysis of the public X-ray spectral and timing data. No coherent pulsations were detected in the Chandra/HRC data. The 3 sigma upper limit on the pulsed fraction is less than 35% for P > 20 ms. The Chandra/ACIS spectrum of the point source may be fitted with an ideal blackbody (kT = 0.5 keV) or with blackbody models modified by the presence of a neutron star atmosphere (kT = 0.25-0.35 keV), but the temperature is higher and the inferred emitting area lower than expected for a 300 yr old neutron star according to standard cooling models. The spectrum may also be fitted with a power-law model (photon index Gamma = 2.8-3.6). Both the spectral properties and the timing limits of the point source are inconsistent with a young Crab-like pulsar but are quite similar to the properties of the anomalous X-ray pulsars. The spectral parameters are also very similar to those of the other radio-quiet X-ray point sources in the supernova remnants Pup A, RCW 103, and PKS 1209-52. Current limits on an optical counterpart for the Cas A point source rule out models that invoke fallback accretion onto a compact object if fallback disk properties are similar to those in quiescent low-mass X-ray binaries. However, the optical limits are marginally consistent with plausible alternative assumptions for a fallback disk. In this case, accreting neutron star models can explain the X-ray data, but an accreting black hole model is not promising.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service